Re-Thinking the Bounds Discrediting the Past and Ambiguity of Utopian Fiction

Main Article Content

Samet Can Emekli


Retrospection has been pivotal within the cumulative understanding of progress. Yet, to innovate, we must reconsider the fixed terms - their signifacence and potency of a successful representation - in retrospect.  In this regard, I will discuss the disfunction of attributing Thomas More's Utopia to refer an entire genre. On contrary to the accustomed - fixed - conception of utopian fiction, there is a better alternative, which is also capable of reflecting contemporary concerns about imaginative futures: Social science-fiction. In order to discredit the use of utopia/Utopia and promote the use of social science-fiction as anew, the discussion will be elaborated with examples and references both preceding and succeeding Utopia.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Emekli, S. (2019). Re-Thinking the Bounds. Journal of English Language and Literature Club, 1(2), 28-33. Retrieved from


Elkins, Charles. (1977). An Approach to the Social Functions of American SF. Science Fiction Studies, 4(3), 228-232. Print.
Filipowska, Lily. (2016). Engaging with Utopian Literature. The Journal of the Core Curriculum, 25, 138-141. Print.
Fitting, Peter. (2010). Utopia, Dystopia and Science Fiction. In. Gregory Claeys (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature (pp. 135-154). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.
Gerlach, Nell, and Sheryl N. Hamilton. (2003). Introduction: A History of Social Science Fiction. Science Fiction Studies, 30(2), 161-173. Print.
Gordin, Michael D., et al. (2010). Introduction: Utopia and Dystopia beyond Space and Time. In M. D. Gordin, et al. (Eds.) Utopia/Dystopia: Conditions of Historical Possibility (pp. 1-18). Princeton, USA: Princeton UP.
Hutcheon, Linda. (1989). Historiographic Metafiction: Parody and the Intertextuality of History. In Intertextuality and Contemporary American Fiction (pp. 3-32). Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins UP.
Johns, Alessa. (2010). Feminism and Utopianism. In. Gregory Claeys (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature (pp. 174-200). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.
Le Guin, Ursula K. (2002). The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia. New York, USA: Harper Collins Publishers.
Le Guin, Ursula K. (1976). A Response to the Le Guin Issue (SFS#7). Science Fiction Studies, 3(1), 43-46. Print.
Mitchell, Timothy. (2011). Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. New York, USA: Verso Books.
More, Thomas. (1997). Utopia. Dover Publications, eBook.
Suvin, Darko. (1979). Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. New Haven, USA: Yale UP.
Vieira, Fátima. (2010). The Concept of Utopia. In. Gregory Claeys (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature (pp. 3-28). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.
Wagner, Jill E. (2008). Christine De Pizan’s City of Ladies: A Monumental (Re)Construction of, by, and for Women of All Time. MFF, 44(1), 68-80. Print.