Dystopia Above, Utopia Below Exchange of Meaning Between Spaces in Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere

Main Article Content

TUĞDE YILDIZ

Abstract

My proposed paper takes Neil Gaiman’s novel Neverwhere as its main subject and aims to show how the story uses the concept of urban space and fantasy under the light of the quest motif in order to demonstrate how the perception of spaces change attached to the individual’s personal development as expected from the journey of the protagonist. London with its uncanny other characterizes the function of the city in this quest while also illustrating different spaces in which the individual deems as utopic and dystopic in their discourse. Protagonist's adventure takes place in an unusual and unpredictable space where everything is identical to London he knows and yet everything that does not define the same London. With the theme of compare and contrast, the narrative provides us with different perspectives and with what is provided this paper aims to show how the meaning of spaces change within this fantastic journey and how the exchangeable definitions of two different Londons shift between meanings as utopic and dystopic spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
YILDIZ, T. 2019. Dystopia Above, Utopia Below. Journal of English Language and Literature Club. 1, 2 (Sep. 2019), 40-44.
Section
Articles

References

Barthes, R. (1997). Semiology and the Urban. In N. Leach, Rethinking Architecture A Reader in Cultural Theory (pp. 158-172). New York: Routledge.
Dion, N. (2013). Spacing Freud: Space and Place in Psychoanalytic Theory. Ottawa: Library
and Archives Canada = Bibliothèque et Archives Canada.
Gaiman, N. (1996). Neverwhere. New York: Avon Books.
Kula, J. (2016). London Below as the world of things lost and forgotten. The Representation of Memories as Imprinted in the Cityscape Portrayed in Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere. The Place of Memory and Memory of Place, 233–248.
Leder, D. (1990). Flesh and Blood: A Proposed Supplement to Merleau-Ponty. Human
Studies, 13(3), 209-219. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009095